Within the immense confusion regarding the US strikes on Venezuela, the apprehension of leader NicolĂĄs Maduro, and the declaration by Donald Trump that the US will âcontrolâ the country and âreclaim the petroleum resourcesâ, there is no doubt â this establishes a profoundly disturbing precedent.
The United States has a grim history of meddling, military incursions, and control in that part of the world, but this past Saturday morning marked its first major military attack on the continent of South America. âThe preeminence of America in this region is now beyond dispute,â the President stated.
The decision to unilaterally attack another independent nation and capture its head of state â only a few days after he openly looked for a diplomatic solution â possesses far-reaching consequences. This ought to concern everyone.
Venezuelans have lived through a dictatorship marked by theft and failure under Mr Maduro, largely considered to have stolen the last election. They now face profound uncertainty at best. Mr Trump has indicated that the vice president, Delcy RodrĂguez would do as the US says, and dismissed conservative dissident leader and Nobel prize-winner MarĂa Corina Machado as a credible successor.
However, Ms RodrĂguez, now the acting leader, has so far adopted a posture of resistance â and other elements of the decapitated regime are even more hardline.
A man who came to office vowing to end foreign wars now says he is âunconcerned about deploying troopsâ. Rebranding the Department of Defense as the Department of War was more than posturing. He no longer views the worldâs superpower as a guardian of order; he is turning it into a lawless actor.
He holds the view that the United States' strength permits it to do as it wishes with minimal cost: observe the military actions against Nigeria and Iranian installations. He claims that control of Venezuela's petroleum means this most recent venture âwonât cost us a pennyâ.
George W. Bush invaded Iraq on a lie. But this unlawful assault came absent any United Nations mandate or the consent of the US Congress; key legislators received no advance notice and say they were given false information in briefings. Mr Trump aims not merely to stretch international norms, but to obliterate them.
Put aside the signal this transmits to Vladimir Putin, Xi Jinping and others, and ask where the US itself is heading. While the raid is said to have slain 40 Venezuelans, including civilians, not a single US soldier was lost. Mr Trumpâs increasing belief in his impunity will surely embolden further adventurism.
No one buys the pretext that this is about drugs. Venezuela is only a small transit route for cocaine; Mr Trump recently granted clemency to the past Honduran leader Juan Orlando HernĂĄndez for drugs and weapons crimes. Mr Trump himself has stated plainly that he is motivated by the allure of petroleum resources as well as machismo, the worldview of key officials, and the desire for glory as domestic popularity wanes.
The international response, especially in Europe, has â with notable outliers â been alarmingly quiet. Thatâs not due to Mr Maduroâs sins, but fear of Mr Trumpâs wrath. The forceful statement from UN Secretary General AntĂłnio Guterres was notable, but this episode highlights the waning power of international bodies.
Mr Trumpâs voters who oppose foreign entanglements could still pressure him to redirect his gaze inward â but soaring healthcare premiums, economic unhappiness and distracting files make foreign conflicts more appealing.
Barely 12 months into his time in office. The international community may live to repent if they fail to speak up today, with the question of which nation is next looming.
A digital strategist with over a decade of experience helping businesses leverage technology for competitive advantage and sustainable growth.